Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 211(6): 700.e1-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24956550

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between planned cesarean delivery and induction of labor in women with class III obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2)). STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified all women with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m(2) who delivered a singleton at our institution from January 2007 to February 2013 via planned cesarean or induction of labor (regardless of eventual delivery route) at 37-41 weeks. Patients in spontaneous labor were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity including death as well as operative, infection, and thromboembolic complications. The secondary outcome was a neonatal morbidity composite. Additional outcomes included individual components of the composites. Student t, χ(2), and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. To calculate adjusted odds ratios, covariates were analyzed via multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There are 661 mother-infant pairs that met enrollment criteria-399 inductions and 262 cesareans. Groups were similar in terms of prepregnancy weight, pregnancy weight gain, and delivery body mass index. Of the 399 inductions, 258 had cervical ripening (64.7%) and 163 (40.9%) had a cesarean delivery. After multivariable adjustments, there was no significant difference in the maternal morbidity composite (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.77) or in the neonatal morbidity composite (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.77) between the induction and cesarean groups. CONCLUSION: In term pregnant women with class III obesity, planned cesarean does not appear to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity compared with induction of labor.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/methods , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Labor, Induced/methods , Obesity, Morbid , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications , Adult , Cesarean Section, Repeat/methods , Cohort Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Endometritis/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Maternal Mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 31(9): 805-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to examine the relationship between sickle cell trait (Hb AS) and other sickle hemoglobinopathies and the risk of thromboembolism during pregnancy or the puerperium. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of African American women receiving prenatal care from 1991 to 2006. Sickle cell status was ascertained by routine hemoglobin electrophoresis. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) was defined as one or more episodes of deep venous and/or pulmonary thromboembolism during pregnancy or the puerperium according to discharge diagnoses based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. RESULTS: Among 22,140 women with hemoglobin (Hb) AA status, 20 women (0.09%) experienced pregnancy-related VTE compared with 3 women (0.15%) of 2,037 women with Hb AS; relative risk (RR) for the association with AS status = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 5.5. Of 103 women, 3 women (2.9%) with sickle cell disease conditions (Hb SS, Hb SC, or Hb S,beta-thalassemia) experienced thromboembolism. Compared with women with Hb AA status, the RR = 32.2, 95% CI 9.7 to 107. CONCLUSION: Sickle cell trait may be associated with a modest increase in VTE in the setting of pregnancy; sickle cell disease conditions are strongly associated with this rare but potentially fatal outcome.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/epidemiology , Sickle Cell Trait/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Alabama/epidemiology , Female , Hemoglobin SC Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 121(1): 33-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23262925

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of cesarean wound disruption or infection after closure with surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture. METHODS: Women with viable pregnancies at 24 weeks of gestation or greater undergoing scheduled or unscheduled cesarean delivery were randomized to wound closure with surgical staples or absorbable suture. Staples were removed at postoperative days 3-4 for low transverse incisions and days 7-10 for vertical incisions. Standardized wound evaluations were performed at discharge (days 3-4) and 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of wound disruption or infection within 4-6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included operative time, highest pain score on analog scale, cosmesis score, and patient scar satisfaction score. Analyses were by intent to treat. RESULTS: Of 398 patients, 198 were randomized to staples and 200 to suture (but four received staples). Baseline characteristics including body mass index, prior cesarean delivery, labor, and type of skin incision were similar by group. The primary outcome incidence at hospital discharge was 7.1% for staples and 0.5% for suture (P<.001, relative risk 14.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-106). Of 350 (87.9%) with follow-up at 4-6 weeks, the cumulative risk of the primary outcome at 4-6 weeks was 14.5% for staples and 5.9% for suture (P=.008, relative risk 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.0). Operative time was longer with suture closure (median time of 58 versus 48 minutes; P<.001). Pain scores at 72-96 hours and at 6 weeks, cosmesis score, and patient satisfaction score did not differ by group. CONCLUSION: Staples closure compared with suture is associated with significantly increased composite wound morbidity after cesarean delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: : ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01008449. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : I.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Sutures , Adult , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Operative Time , Pain/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Risk , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...